CLIENT CASE STUDY
“We thought we were years away.
Turned out we weren’t.”
How Mark and Susan went from rough spreadsheets and a percentage-fee adviser to a full retirement plan and a retirement date three years earlier than they expected.
a month, net. The spending target Mark and Susan set.
Mark's retirement age. His own spreadsheet had said 63.
Sustainability score at retirement.
Based on a real client. Names changed and images posed by models. One client’s circumstances, not indicative of results others may achieve. This does not constitute financial advice.
The situation
Mark and Susan
Mark was 59 and had spent his career in manufacturing. He had built up a solid pension and used his ISA allowance most years. He also had £540,000 of inherited cash, which had sat in a savings account for seven years because he didn't want to invest it badly.
Susan, 57, had worked part-time since their youngest left home. She had a small income, a small defined benefit pension and no debt.
Between them they had more than they realised.
Eighteen months earlier, on a friend's recommendation, Mark had met another adviser. The proposal set out a fee of 1% of everything invested, a restricted fund range and a retirement date of 65, possibly 63. It didn't include a cashflow model or a plan for drawing an income.
Mark came across Blincoe while looking into fixed-fee advisers. A fee that rose with the portfolio had sat less comfortably with him the longer he thought about it.
He was a nice bloke. We spent the hour talking about funds and hardly talked about us at all.
Mark, on the adviser he met first
The cashflow model
A retirement date of 60
Before any talk of products or platforms, we built a cashflow model: Mark and Susan's finances year by year, from now to age 95. It took in Susan's defined benefit pension from 60, State Pension for both of them at 67, their ISAs and pensions, and the £540,000 in cash.
Mark had kept his own spreadsheet for years, and it always put 63 as the earliest realistic date. The cashflow model put it at 60.
I asked them to run it again because I didn't believe it.
Mark
His spreadsheet used a rough withdrawal rate. It left out Susan's defined benefit income, the step up when State Pension starts at 67, and the effect of drawing from each wrapper in the right order. With those included, the date moved three years.
Two minutes. No obligation.
The plan
Four parts to the plan
The inherited cash
£540,000 split across ISAs, pensions, a general investment account and an offshore bond.
Drawdown order
Income taken from four wrappers in a set order, to keep each year's tax bill down.
Guardrails
A sustainability score each year, with the spending response agreed in advance.
A fixed fee
A monthly fee that stays the same as the portfolio grows.
Investing the inherited cash
The cash came first. It had earned little for seven years, and how it was split would shape their tax position for decades.
Both ISA allowances went in straight away: £40,000 into stocks and shares ISAs. We made pension contributions for both of them, using carry-forward of unused annual allowance from earlier years. Some went into a general investment account (GIA). The largest share went into an offshore investment bond.
Inside an offshore bond, investments grow without UK income tax or capital gains tax being deducted each year. Tax is deferred until money is taken out, so growth has longer to compound over a long retirement, and the bond gives a flexible source of income later on.
| Wrapper | Role in the plan | Tax treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Pension Both |
Topped up using carry-forward. Drawn first, within the personal allowance. | 25% of each withdrawal usually free of income tax. The rest is taxed as income. |
| ISA Both |
£40,000 invested at the start. Drawn last. | No income tax or CGT on growth or withdrawals. |
| GIA | Holds the overflow. Gains taken each year up to the CGT annual exempt amount. | CGT on gains, income tax on dividends, each above the annual allowance. |
| Offshore bond | Largest allocation. Withdrawals of up to 5% a year. | No UK tax deducted on growth inside the bond. Up to 5% p.a. can be withdrawn, with tax deferred until the bond is cashed in. |
The order income is drawn
Until State Pension starts at 67, income comes from four sources in this order.
-
Pension, up to the personal allowance
A quarter of each pension withdrawal is usually free of income tax. We size each year's withdrawal so the taxable three quarters fits within Mark's personal allowance (£12,570), so this income carries little or no income tax.
-
GIA, up to the CGT allowance
Each year we sell enough from the GIA to use the annual CGT exempt amount, which can't be carried forward. The amount is small, but over ten years it keeps down a gain that would otherwise keep building.
-
Offshore bond, 5% a year
HMRC rules allow up to 5% of the amount invested to be withdrawn each year, on a cumulative basis for up to 20 years, with no immediate tax charge. Tax is deferred until the bond is cashed in. On a large bond, that is a steady income in the background.
-
ISA, drawn last
Nothing is taxed on the way out, so there is no reason to use it early. Leaving it alone keeps a pot available later, for care costs or to pass on.
Between them, the four sources cover the £6,000 a month Mark and Susan want to spend. The aim is to pay no more tax than the rules require in any year.
Guardrails
With the structure in place, we added risk-based guardrails. Each year we score how sustainable their spending is, given what markets have done. The score falls into a zone, and each zone has a response that was agreed before Mark retired.
That was the bit that landed most for me. I'd always worried about retiring into a bad year and making the wrong call in a panic. Now I know what we'd do before it happens.
Mark
At retirement their score was 82%, in the Surplus Zone. How the guardrails framework works
Two minutes. No obligation.
The result
Where Mark and Susan are now
Retired at 60
Three years before the date Mark's own spreadsheet gave.
£6,000 a month, net
Their full spending target, from the first month.
The cash invested
£540,000 across four wrappers, each with a set role.
A plan for bad years
The response to a market fall was agreed before it could happen.
A fixed monthly fee
It doesn't rise as the portfolio grows, and the difference against a percentage fee stays invested and compounds.
Susan works one day a week
Her choice. The plan doesn't depend on the income.
I spent years thinking I needed to understand every detail before I could decide anything. What I needed was someone I trusted to tell me we were ready. We were.
Mark
Talk to Blincoe
Start with a few questions
Answer a few short questions about your situation. If it looks like we can help, you can book an introductory call with one of our planners at the end.
Two minutes. No obligation.
The value of investments and any income from them can fall and you may get back less than you invested.
The Financial Conduct Authority does not regulate tax advice, trust advice or estate planning. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may change. Offshore bonds are not suitable for everyone.
A pension is a long-term investment. Funds are not normally accessible until age 55 (rising to 57 from April 2028).